Translate This
Boycott Workfare is a UK-wide campaign to end forced unpaid work for people who receive welfare. Workfare profits the rich by providing free labour, whilst threatening the poor by taking away welfare rights if people refuse to work without a living wage. We are a grassroots campaign, formed in 2010 by people with experience of workfare and those concerned about its impact. We expose and take action against companies and organisations profiting from workfare; encourage organisations to pledge to boycott it; and actively inform people of their rights.

What’s wrong with Charity Workfare?

Posted: September 7th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Charities | 14 Comments »

Big businesses have rightly received a lot of criticism for their involvement in workfare. But it isn’t just big businesses. Many of the UK’s best known charities are also involved, which is why they’re the focus of our day of action this weekend. Here are our top 10 reasons to oppose charity workfare:

1. It puts claimants at risk of sanctions

Anyone who refuses to carry out a mandatory workfare placement with a charity (or who fails to attend for any reason) faces the loss of benefits – a sanction. Because of government targets the number of claimants receiving sanctions tripled between 2009 and 2011, to over half a million. Later this year the government plan to make this situation even worse by introducing sanctions that last for 3 years. People are often sanctioned for trivial reasons such as missing appointments or being late. Those charities delivering workfare are at the heart of this process of undermining welfare protection and stripping claimants of their benefits.

2. It perpetuates poverty

By colluding with the government to increase the number of benefit sanctions charities are pushing vulnerable people further into poverty and destitution. Oxfam have refused to take part in workfare because they say it is incompatible with the goal of reducing poverty in the UK. When homelessness charity SHP left the Work Programme earlier this year they warned that sanctions were pushing vulnerable individuals further into poverty and leaving them with little option but to beg and steal. The increase in benefit sanctions is one of the reasons that we are seeing an increase in the use of food banks.

3. It punishes people for being unemployed

The workfare schemes that charities are involved in are mandatory, demeaning and punitive. Forced unpaid work is a punishment that was previously only meted out by our criminal justice system. The four week Mandatory Work Activity scheme is the equivalent of a medium level community service order of the kind that a person might be sentenced to if they were found guilty of drink driving or assault. The maximum community sentence that a judge can hand out is for 300 hours, but claimants on some workfare schemes are being forced to work without pay for 780 hours. The community workfare schemes that charities are supporting literally treat the unemployed as if they were criminals.

4. It puts claimants at risk of bullying

Workfare is part of a government and media narrative which stereotypes and stigmatises claimants as ‘workshy scroungers’. By participating in workfare charities are reinforcing the stigmatisation of those on benefits. We have received several disturbing reports from people who have experienced bullying from staff members and managers whilst on placements with charity shops. Claimants on mandatory work placements under threat of sanctions are in a vulnerable position and understandably may not feel able to challenge bullying or to complain when it happens.

5. It enables commercial workfare

After the controversy surrounding Tesco’s use of workfare earlier this year the government removed some sanctions from commercial workfare schemes. They are now organising workfare programmes so that the commercial schemes are ‘voluntary’ whilst ‘community benefit’ schemes remain mandatory. The government have said that those who refuse to take part in ‘voluntary’ schemes will instead be considered for mandatory work. It is a case of ‘volunteer or be volunteered’.

6. It displaces paid work

The so-called ‘community benefit’ schemes which charities support also involve work placements in the public sector and with private companies. The displacement of paid work may not be as obvious in the charity sector, but will still happen as the government encourage charities to take over the running of services previously provided by other sectors.

7. It undermines the principle of volunteering

Workfare is forced work. As Oxfam have pointed out charity involvement damages the belief people have in the value of genuine voluntary work. People are even being forced to give up doing voluntary work in order to do mandatory workfare with other charities, and charities themselves have complained that they have lost volunteers to workfare schemes.

8. It undermines transparency

Because of the way in which they are funded charities have a duty to be open and honest about their activities. Sadly when it comes to workfare this is not happening because charities know that their involvement is unpopular with their supporters. Charities are refusing to answer questions about which schemes they are involved in, or to say how many placements they provide. Some of the charities involved are now issuing deceitful statements trying to suggest that those on mandatory workfare placements are volunteers.

9. It brings charities into disrepute

Involvement in workfare undermines the good reputation that charities have with the public and alienates their own supporters.  For some charities their involvement represents a betrayal of the very people they claim to be supporting. Charities who claim to be campaigning against welfare reforms are at the same time signing up to deliver workfare and refer claimants for sanctions.

10. It doesn’t work

Charities justify their involvement by parroting the government lie that workfare helps the unemployed and provides useful experience. But workfare doesn’t provide useful training and the placements are not chosen to support individual circumstances and needs. Research commissioned by the DWP has shown that workfare doesn’t work, and that it can even reduce employment chances. Unfortunately the government are ideologically committed to ignoring the evidence.

It must stop…

We need to make sure that charities understand that their involvement in workfare is unacceptable and that it will damage their reputation. If you shop with or donate to a workfare charity then please let them know that you oppose their involvement and ask them to withdraw. Please support the Boycott Workfare campaign, and our day of action against charity workfare this Saturday.

Ten workfare charities:

Barnardos
British Heart Foundation
British Trust for Conservation Volunteers
Cancer Research UK
Community Service Volunteers
Papworth Trust
RSPCA
Salvation Army
Scope
Sue Ryder


14 Comments on “What’s wrong with Charity Workfare?”

  1. 1 The Red Pepper round-up: 14 September | Red Pepper blog | Red Pepper said at 11:06 pm on September 14th, 2012:

    [...] shifted their workfare schemes into the charity sector in the hope of rebranding workfare. Here are 10 arguments detailing what is wrong with charity workfare. In other workfare news, yet another case study has emerged of workfare being used to replace paid [...]

  2. 2 What’s wrong with Charity Workfare? « kickingthecat said at 6:57 pm on September 17th, 2012:

    [...] http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=1573 [...]

  3. 3 10/09/12: Fight homophobia! Boycott Workfare! – In The Sprawl said at 10:13 pm on September 18th, 2012:

    [...] What’s wrong with Charity Workfare? [...]

  4. 4 Elspeth R said at 11:43 am on October 17th, 2012:

    I wrote this before workfare – it questions charity shops volunteer workforce and ethics anyway. Now there is even more reason to query this as it melds with bullying benefit regimes

    http://voices.yahoo.com/should-charity-shops-run-volunteers-2117386.html

  5. 5 Anyone With a Heart Would Not Support Workfare | Birmingham Against The Cuts said at 1:57 pm on October 29th, 2012:

    [...] will be holding a demonstration at the British Heart Foundation on Harborne High Street because of their involvement with workfare programmes that will see benefit claimants kicked off benefits for three years if they don’t take part [...]

  6. 6 Mark Hickman said at 10:36 am on November 8th, 2012:

    Could someone please contact me with contact details of the organiser of the Harborne Demo this Saturday. There are no issues our end. However, the Herat Foundation no longer work with workfare.

  7. 7 British Heart Foundation May Be Withdrawing From Workfare As Demonstrations Continue | Birmingham Against The Cuts said at 12:17 pm on November 11th, 2012:

    [...] demonstration against the use of forced workfare labour by companies and charities in Birmingham was held on Harborne high street yesterday, with the British Heart Foundation and [...]

  8. 8 Week of Action against workfare – Charities stop exploiting the unemployed! | the void said at 12:43 pm on November 15th, 2012:

    [...] our blog on what’s wrong with charity workfare for more and check back as the week approaches for leaflets, and online action to take as [...]

  9. 9 Week of Action against workfare – Charities stop exploiting the unemployed! « Benefit Claimants Fightback said at 3:24 pm on November 15th, 2012:

    [...] our blog on what’s wrong with charity workfare for more and check back as the week approaches for leaflets, and online action to take as [...]

  10. 10 The Salvation Army and #Workfare Controversy | eChurch Blog said at 1:11 pm on January 19th, 2013:

    [...] What’s wrong with charity #workfare? boycottworkfare.org/?p=1573 [...]

  11. 11 Scott Hutchins said at 7:55 pm on February 8th, 2013:

    In the United States, at least in New York State, *only* charities participate in workfare, and they are forbidden from paying their “volunteers” unless they go through the channels to hire them. Most say it’s not in their budget to hire and abuse the system. I faced that with Housing Works Thrift Shop in 2006. I’m currently in one at Moravian House, but they haven’t actually had me work, so I wouldn’t expect them to pay me.

  12. 12 Boycott Workfare » Blog Archive » Open Letter To The YMCA said at 1:42 pm on March 5th, 2013:

    [...] We do not think you should withdraw from workfare “because of the negative impact inflicted by a handful of people”, you should withdraw because of the reasons given in our post “What’s Wrong With Charity Workfare?” [...]

  13. 13 Boycott Workfare » Blog Archive » What they didn’t tell you at the Age UK’s For Later Life Conference said at 9:41 pm on April 30th, 2013:

    [...] for a charity should be a choice. Forcing people to volunteer undermines the value of genuine volunteering, which is by definition, voluntary. In fact, using mandatory workfare placements means that Age UK [...]

  14. 14 Birmingham Trades Council » What they didn’t tell you at the Age UK’s For Later Life Conference said at 3:56 am on May 1st, 2013:

    [...] for a charity should be a choice. Forcing people to volunteer undermines the value of genuine volunteering, which is by definition, voluntary. In fact, using mandatory workfare placements means that Age UK [...]


Leave a Reply